“A no-brainer purchase for any agency or development team” – Mark B, Developer

BugHerd vs MarkUp.io: Which Website Feedback Tool is Right for your Team?

Compare BugHerd and MarkUp.io for website feedback, client reviews, QA, bug tracking, task management, technical metadata, setup, and pricing.

google icon
Continue with Google
Or sign up with email
arrow icon
green tick icon

No credit card required.

green tick icon

60-day money back guarantee.

annotation arrowannotation arrowannotation arrowred pin icon

Join 10,000+ companies, 350,000+ users across 172 countries.

See what they have to say about us
arrow icon

BugHerd vs MarkUp.io: Which website feedback tool is right for your team?

BugHerd and MarkUp.io both help teams collect visual feedback on websites. Instead of relying on screenshots, email threads, spreadsheets, or vague comments, both tools make it easier for reviewers to leave feedback directly in context. The difference is what happens after feedback is collected.

MarkUp.io is a visual commenting tool for websites and digital content. It is useful when teams want to review creative assets, websites, PDFs, images, videos, documents, and other files in one place.

‍BugHerd is a website feedback and task management tool for web development agencies and website teams. It turns website feedback into actionable tasks, captures screenshots and technical details, and gives teams a built-in project board for managing feedback through to completion.
‍
While both platforms support website feedback, MarkUp.io takes a broader approach to visual collaboration across many digital asset types, whereas BugHerd is purpose-built for agencies and web development teams managing website feedback from review through to resolution.
‍

BugHerd vs MarkUp.io: Side-by-side comparison

The most important difference between BugHerd and MarkUp.io is workflow.

MarkUp.io is built around visual comments. A reviewer can add feedback to a website or file, and the team can discuss that feedback in context.

BugHerd is built around website delivery. A reviewer can click on a website, leave feedback, and BugHerd turns that feedback into a task. That task automatically includes a screenshot, page URL, browser information, operating system, screen size, assignee, status, priority, comments, and workflow history.And now with BugHerd MCP, your AI can read every client comment and make any changes right in your codebase, CMS or design tool.

That makes BugHerd better suited to agencies and web teams that need to efficiently manage and action feedback, not just collect it.
‍

BugHerd MarkUp.io
Best for Web development agencies, website teams, QA, UAT and client feedback Creative, marketing and content teams reviewing digital assets
Primary use case Website feedback that becomes actionable tasks Visual collaboration and review across digital content
Supported content Websites, Figma designs, PDFs and images Websites, PDFs, images, videos, documents, presentations and other digital assets
Website feedback ✅ Purpose-built ✅ Supported
Creative & content review Good Excellent
Built-in task management ✅ Project board with workflow, priorities and assignees Comment assignment, threaded discussions and comment status
Developer handoff Automatic screenshots, URL, browser, OS, screen size and technical metadata Visual comments with contextual information
QA & UAT workflows Excellent Good
AI capabilities BugHerd MCP connects AI coding assistants to website feedback workflows No native AI workflow features
Client feedback Guest feedback with no account required Guest feedback via shared review links
Starting price (as of July 2026) From US$42/month From US$79/month

When to choose BugHerd & when to choose MarkUp.io

Choose BugHerd if... Choose MarkUp.io if...
You need to manage website QA from feedback through to resolution. You need a simple way to annotate websites and files.
You work in a digital agency and your developers use Jira, Asana, GitHub or ClickUp. You don't need built-in task management.
You want technical metadata captured automatically with every comment. You're primarily collecting visual comments.

Summary: MarkUp.io is a lightweight visual annotation tool, while BugHerd is a complete website feedback and QA platform.

Quick answer: BugHerd vs MarkUp.io

Choose BugHerd if you want a stable, agency-focused website feedback tool with a clear setup path for clients, JavaScript installation available on all plans, no browser extension required for reviewers, and built-in task management for turning feedback into completed work.
‍
BugHerd is best for web development agencies, developers, QA teams, UAT workflows, project managers, and website teams that need feedback to become organized, assigned, and trackable.
‍
‍Choose MarkUp.io if you mainly need broad visual review across websites, images, PDFs, videos, documents, and other digital files.
‍
MarkUp.io is best for teams that mainly need visual commenting across many content types and do not need a dedicated website feedback workflow.
‍
‍In a nutshell:

  • BugHerd helps teams collect, assign, track, and resolve website feedback.
  • MarkUp.io helps teams collect and discuss visual comments.
award icon
image of customer
Daniel Billingham

Senior Product Designer

“BugHerd is the ideal feedback and collaboration tool that supports the needs of clients, designers, project managers, and developers.”

Detailed feature comparison between
BugHerd & MarkUp.io

google icon
Continue with Google
Or sign up with email
arrow icon

Getting started

BugHerd is known for its intuitive and simple-to-use interface, enabling teams to get up and running right away, with minimal setup or training.  It's the go-to tool for web development and design team members because it's easy to get started quickly without extensive setup or training. Teams can get started with a simple browser extension or by installing a JavaScript on the website they are looking for feedback on.  

It's also easy for clients to get started as there is no need for them to set up a login. They simply get invited into a project and away they go. The point-and-click interface allows them to comment directly on live web websites, without needing to navigate complex menus or systems, and no steep learning curve.   
How to get started on BugHerd

💡 How do they compare?

While MarkUp.io provides robust features, its emphasis on product development can make it more complicated to configure and customize for particular projects. This added complexity can make it more difficult for teams that need a fast, streamlined solution for managing feedback and tracking bugs efficiently.

Collecting website feedback

Gathering website feedback is easy with BugHerd as users are able to simply point-and-click directly on the spot where an issue occurs.  They are able to leave a simple comment, annotate a screenshot, attach a file, and even leave feedback via video recordings. No more back and forth emails! 

All feedback is turned into actionable tasks, streamlining the client feedback workflow, and minimizing the need for follow-up. This efficient system ensures that gathering and managing website feedback is smooth and hassle-free.
Website feedback made easy

💡 How do they compare?

MarkUp.io provides annotation features and visual feedback, but its broader focus can make it less specialized and streamlined for web-specific feedback when compared to BugHerd. While it’s a strong tool for gathering feedback in product development and customer experience contexts, its approach may not be as tailored to the needs of web development teams.

Automatic capture of technical data

With every piece of feedback, BugHerd automatically captures a screenshot, along with user metadata such as browser, exact URL, operating system, screen resolution, etc.

This data is automatically converted into tasks that can be assigned to team members for actioning. This especially beneficial during the QA and UAT phases of web development, as it helps teams quickly capture and address user feedback, and eliminates any chasing of information.
More on tech info capture

💡 How do they compare?

MarkUp.io does not automatically capture metadata during the website feedback process. It focuses primarily on providing visual feedback and annotations but lacks the ability to gather technical details like browser information, operating system, or screen resolution.

All feedback centralized in one location

Task management is easy as BugHerd comes with an in-built Kanban-style task board, enabling team members to manage feedback directly within the platform. This makes it simple to manage feedback from your team, clients and stakeholders, and it makes sure that everyone is on the same page. Remove duplicate tasks, assign them to your team for completion, and set severities.

If you prefer to manage feedback using other tools, that's no problem.  BugHerd integrates with leading project management tools like ClickUp, Asana, Trello, monday.com, and many more.
More on task tracking

💡 How do they compare?

MarkUp.io does not include an in-built task management board. The only way to manage tasks is by integrating the platform with an external project management tool.

feature - mcp ai tool reads task

BugHerd MCP: Your AI reads every task, triages and acts on it

BugHerd MCP connects your AI agent (Claude Code, Cursor, ChatGPT, VS Code, Windsurf, Codex & more) directly to your BugHerd projects, tasks, and client feedback.

Your AI reads every client comment, screenshot, recording, URL, and full context – making any changes right in your codebase, CMS or design tool.

  • Read task context:  get_task_details
  • List tasks by project, assignee, or across all projects: list_project_tasks · list_my_tasks · list_all_tasks
  • Mark done, reassign, reprioritize, update severity or due date: update_task\
  • Post fix summaries, analysis, or client updates into the task thread: add_comment
  • Create new tasks, projects, or update project settings: create_task · create_project · update_project
Find out more

💡 How do they compare?

MarkUp.io does not offer a native MCP server for connecting AI agents directly to its platform. However, it can be connected to AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude through third-party services such as Zapier MCP, rather than through a built-in integration.

Public Feedback Collection

BugHerd's public feedback collection is one of its key features and allows website visitors to leave comments or report bugs, even after the web dev project has wrapped up. It makes it easy to gather feedback and insights from the wider audience on an ongoing basis so that you're always up-to-date on bugs.  The feedback is automatically captured along with technical data, enabling development teams to address issues efficiently and accurately.
Always on feedback capture

💡 How do they compare?

MarkUp.io does not offer a public feedback widget. It focuses on providing feedback and annotations for team collaboration, but it doesn't have a feature that allows external users, such as website visitors, to leave public feedback directly on live pages.

image of custom logos and custom columns features of BugHerd

Customization and flexibility

BugHerd offers key customization features that enable web design and dev team members to tailor the tool to their unique needs without being overloaded with excessive options.  BugHerd's custom workflows allow you to set up each project the way you want, adding the relevant team members, controlling client visibility, and tailoring the sequences of tasks to suit your team’s preference.  

The feedback widget is conveniently positioned as a sidebar on live websites, and enables creative agencies to set up their own custom branding.  This allows you to match the widget's appearance to your brand's colors and style, creating a more cohesive and professional experience for clients or users providing feedback.  

💡 How do they compare?

MarkUp.io offers a few basic customization options to enhance the user experience. You can personalize certain aspects of the feedback experience, such as controlling who has access to leave comments or annotations on a project. Additionally, teams can choose to share feedback links with specific collaborators or clients, offering some level of control over the feedback process. However, MarkUp.io does not provide in-depth branding or widget customization options, such as adjusting colors or adding logos to match your brand identity.

Pricing and value for money

BugHerd is competitively priced, with plans that offer excellent value:

Standard: $42/month
Studio: $67/month
Premium: $125/month
‍
All plans offer unlimited projects and unlimited guests. The focus on providing all essential features at an accessible price point makes BugHerd an attractive option for any web agency and in-house team.
(The pricing listed above is current as of July 2026)
Check out BugHerd pricing
pricing table jan 2025

💡 How do they compare?

MarkUp.io pricing starts at $79/month for the Pro plan, and then there's an Enterprise plan with custom pricing. Both plans offer unlimited users. For teams looking for a tool that balances functionality and affordability, BugHerd is a more comprehensive solution and offers greater value for web development and design projects. (The pricing listed here is current as of July 2026)

integrations wheel

Integrations

BugHerd provides powerful one-way and two-way sync integrations, empowering teams of any size to successfully manage and deliver high-quality web development projects.  This includes integrations with project management, CRM, and customer service tools such as Jira, Trello, ClickUp, monday.com, Slack, MS Teams, as well as Zapier.  

These key integration features make BugHerd a top choice for those looking for an alternative to platforms like MarkUp.io.
View all BugHerd integrations

💡 How do they compare?

As MarkUp.io does not offer an in-built task management board, you will need to integrate with a project management tool in order to manage feedback.  By connecting with popular project management tools like Trello, Asana, and Jira, teams can transfer annotations and comments from MarkUp.io into their existing workflows.  

Make the switch to BugHerd today

Join thousands of web development teams who trust BugHerd for intuitive website feedback and streamlined workflows.
google icon
Continue with Google
Or sign up with email
arrow icon
green tick icon

No credit card required

Who uses BugHerd vs MarkUp.io

BugHerd vs MarkUp.io - for web development agencies

For web development agencies, the key issue is not just whether clients can leave feedback. Both tools can help with that.

The bigger question is whether client feedback can be managed without creating more admin for the agency.

BugHerd is stronger for agencies that need to collect, triage, assign, and resolve feedback across multiple website projects. It gives internal teams a clear workflow for managing client comments, QA issues, bug reports, content changes, and approval feedback.

BugHerd helps agencies manage that process in a structured way.

MarkUp.io can work well when an agency mainly needs visual review across many content formats (eg. PDF, images, etc).

BugHerd is usually the better fit when the agency is responsible for delivering, fixing, QA-ing, and maintaining websites.

BugHerd vs MarkUp.io - for website teams

Website teams need a reliable way to manage feedback from stakeholders, marketers, product managers, designers, developers, QA testers, and external reviewers.

MarkUp.io can help those people leave comments in context.

BugHerd goes further by turning those comments into work items that can be assigned, tracked, and resolved.

That makes BugHerd a better fit for teams managing:

  • Website redesigns.
  • New website builds
  • Landing pages
  • Staging review.
  • Pre-launch QA
  • UAT
  • Content updates
  • Bug fixes
  • Post-launch improvements
  • Ongoing website maintenance

For website teams that need accountability and visibility, BugHerd provides a clearer workflow than visual comments alone.

BugHerd vs MarkUp.io - for QA and UAT

BugHerd is better suited to QA and UAT workflows because it captures the information developers need to reproduce and resolve issues.

When a reviewer reports an issue in BugHerd, the task automatically includes the URL, screenshot, browser, OS, screen size, and related technical details.

That reduces follow-up questions such as:

  • “What page was this on?”
  • “What browser were you using?”
  • “What screen size were you viewing?”
  • “Can you send a screenshot?”

BugHerd's MCP takes this a step further by allowing AI agents (eg. ChatGPT, Claude Code, Cursor, etc) to access BugHerd tasks and use the user’s tech data and task details to triage and even resolve issues. Combined with BugHerd's automatic capture of browser and environment data, this creates a faster, more reliable QA and UAT workflow with less back-and-forth between testers and developers.

MarkUp.io can collect visual feedback, but BugHerd is more purpose-built for the QA-to-resolution workflow.

BugHerd vs MarkUp.io for client feedback

Both BugHerd and MarkUp.io make it easier for clients and stakeholders to leave feedback in context.

The difference is how that feedback is handled after it is submitted.

In MarkUp.io, the feedback is part of a visual review and comment workflow.

In BugHerd, the feedback becomes part of a task workflow. That makes it easier for internal teams to assign ownership, track progress, and close the loop.

For clients, both tools can simplify review.

For internal website teams, BugHerd gives feedback a clearer path to completion.

That is especially important for agencies. Clients do not just want to leave comments; they want to know their feedback has been seen, understood, and handled. 

BugHerd helps agencies manage that expectation without adding more manual project management work.

BugHerd vs MarkUp.io - for developer handoff

A common problem with website feedback is that comments are not detailed enough for developers to act on.

A client might say, “This button looks wrong,” or “The page is broken,” but the developer still needs to know where the issue happened, what browser was used, what screen size the reviewer was on, and what the issue looked like at the time.

BugHerd helps close that gap by capturing technical context with the feedback.

That makes developer handoff easier because the task already includes the information needed to investigate the issue.

MarkUp.io is useful for visual discussion, but BugHerd is better suited when feedback needs to become actionable development work.

BugHerd vs MarkUp.io - for project managers

Project managers need more than comments. They need visibility.

They need to know what feedback has been submitted, which items are urgent, who is responsible, what is blocked, what has been fixed, and what still needs client approval.

BugHerd gives project managers a built-in board for managing website feedback through each stage of the workflow.

That makes it easier to keep client feedback organized, reduce duplicate requests, and avoid feedback getting lost across email, chat, documents, and spreadsheets.

MarkUp.io can help centralize visual comments, but BugHerd gives project managers a clearer system for turning those comments into completed work.

Why BugHerd is stronger for web development agencies and website teams

Website feedback usually involves more than one person.

  • A client notices an issue.
  • A project manager clarifies it.
  • A designer checks whether it matches the design.
  • A developer fixes it.
  • A QA tester confirms it.
  • An account manager tells the client it is done.

Without a structured workflow, that process can quickly turn into screenshots, spreadsheets, email threads, Slack messages, duplicate comments, and repeated follow-ups. 

BugHerd is designed to keep that process in one place. Feedback becomes a task. Tasks live on a project board. Each task can be assigned, prioritized, discussed, moved through a workflow, and marked as complete.

That is the main reason to choose BugHerd over MarkUp.io for website projects.

BugHerd gives web development agencies and website teams a clearer path from client comment to completed work.

‍

BugHerd is the better choice when your team needs to:

  • Collect feedback directly on websites.
  • Turn client comments into tasks.
  • Capture screenshots automatically.
  • Capture browser, operating system, screen size, and page URL.
  • Manage feedback on a task board.
  • Assign feedback to designers, developers, QA testers, or project managers.
  • Track what is open, in progress, resolved, or ready for review.
  • Run QA or UAT on websites.
  • Collect feedback across multiple website projects.
  • Give clients a simple way to leave feedback without creating more admin for your internal team.
  • Connect website feedback to project management and development workflows.

‍

Where MarkUp.io stands out

MarkUp.io is designed for visual collaboration across a wide range of digital content, not just websites. In addition to websites, teams can review and comment on PDFs, images, videos, documents, presentations, and other digital assets from a browser.

It is particularly well suited to marketing, creative, and content teams that need a simple way to collect stakeholder feedback without introducing a complex workflow. Reviewers can leave comments directly on content, collaborate through threaded discussions, assign comments, and track their resolution.

Choose MarkUp.io if your team primarily needs to:

  • Review websites alongside PDFs, videos, images and documents.
  • Collect visual feedback from marketing teams and stakeholders.
  • Manage creative reviews and content approvals.
  • Collaborate on digital assets with simple commenting and review workflows.
  • Use one tool for feedback across multiple content types.

For teams whose primary focus is website development, QA, UAT, and client website delivery, BugHerd provides a more specialised workflow by combining visual feedback with automatic technical metadata, built-in task management, and AI-ready workflows through BugHerd MCP.

‍

‍

Switching from MarkUp.io to BugHerd

Moving from MarkUp.io to BugHerd is usually a setup decision, not a complex migration project.

Most teams can start using BugHerd on an active website the same day. The basic steps are:

  1. Start a free trial.
  2. Create your first project.
  3. Add the website you want to review.
  4. Install the JavaScript snippet, browser extension, or WordPress plugin.
  5. Invite your internal team members.
  6. Share the review link with clients or stakeholders.
  7. Start collecting website feedback as tasks.

You do not need to move every historical MarkUp.io comment into BugHerd before getting started. Many teams keep old MarkUp.io reviews available for reference while running all new website feedback, QA, UAT, and client review rounds through BugHerd.

For a simple switch, start with one active website project. Install BugHerd, invite your team, run the next feedback round, and compare how much easier it is to assign, track, and resolve feedback in one workflow.

For agencies managing multiple client projects, BugHerd can be rolled out project by project. That makes the move easier because you do not need to change every client workflow at once.

‍

Get started now on BugHerd!  

Sign up to a free trial (no credit card required), or book a 1:1 demo with a BugHerd product specialist to have your questions answered on the spot.

‍

Final Recommendation: BugHerd vs MarkUp.io

Choose BugHerd if your team works on websites and needs feedback to become clear, assigned, and trackable work.

Choose MarkUp.io if your team mainly needs simple visual commenting across websites and many types of digital content.

For web development agencies, development teams, QA teams, UAT workflows, project managers, and client-facing website projects, BugHerd is the stronger choice because it connects visual feedback with task management, technical metadata, project boards, and AI-assisted website delivery workflows; giving feedback a clearer path from comment to completion.

But don't just take our word for it.
Customers love us.

award iconaward iconaward iconaward iconaward icon
image of customer
Sam Duncan 📱📏 🌱

@SamWPaquet

icon of review source

"@bugherd where have you been all my life??
‍
We just migrated our bug tracking over from Asana and have at least halved our software testing time🪳👏📈. "

image of customer
Ashley Groenveld

Project Manager

“I use BugHerd all day every day. It has sped up our implementation tenfold.”

image of customer
Sasha Shevelev

Webcoda Co-founder

"Before Bugherd, clients would try to send screenshots with scribbles we couldn't decipher or dozens of emails with issues we were often unable to recreate."

Read case study
image of customer
Mark B

Developer

icon of review source

“A no-brainer purchase for any agency or development team.”

image of customer
Kate L

Director of Operations

icon of review source

"Vital tool for our digital marketing agency.”

image of customer
Paul Tegall

Delivery Manager

"Loving BugHerd! It's making collecting feedback from non-tech users so much easier."

image of customer
Daniel Billingham

Senior Product Designer

“The ideal feedback and collaboration tool that supports the needs of clients, designers, project managers, and developers.”

image of customer
Chris S

CEO & Creative Director

icon of review source

“Our clients LOVE it”

image of customer
Emily VonSydow

Web Development Director

“BugHerd probably saves us
at least 3-4hrs per week.”

Frequently asked questions

Here’s the answer to some commonly asked questions to help you discover if BugHerd is the right tool for you.
Is BugHerd better than MarkUp.io?

BugHerd is better than MarkUp.io for website teams that need feedback to become assigned, trackable tasks. MarkUp.io may be better for teams that mainly need broad visual commenting across different content types.

What is the biggest difference between BugHerd and MarkUp.io?

The biggest difference is workflow. MarkUp.io is mainly for visual commenting and review. BugHerd is for collecting website feedback and managing it as tasks through to completion.

Is BugHerd a good MarkUp.io alternative?

Yes. BugHerd is a strong MarkUp.io alternative for web development agencies, QA teams, developers, project managers, and teams that need to manage client website feedback.

Does BugHerd require a browser extension?

No. BugHerd does not require reviewers to install a browser extension when the JavaScript snippet is installed on the website.

The JavaScript installation is available on all BugHerd plans. Once installed, clients, stakeholders, and internal reviewers can leave feedback directly on the website without installing a browser extension.

BugHerd also offers browser extensions for quick setup, trials, internal reviews, and situations where your team does not have access to the website code.

Do clients need to install anything to use BugHerd?

No. When the BugHerd JavaScript snippet is installed on the website, clients and stakeholders can leave feedback without installing a browser extension. They simply click on a link and they can start leaving feedback right away.

That makes BugHerd suitable for client-facing website reviews, especially when reviewers are non-technical or when you want to avoid asking clients to install additional software.

Does MarkUp.io require a browser extension?

MarkUp.io offers a Chrome extension for website review workflows. Teams can also create website MarkUps from URLs.

How long does it take to set up BugHerd if you are currently using MarkUp.io?

Most teams can get their first BugHerd project ready the same day.

The usual setup is simple: create a project, add your website, install the JavaScript snippet, invite your team, and share the review link with clients or stakeholders.

You can also run BugHerd alongside MarkUp.io during the transition. Many teams keep old MarkUp.io reviews available for reference while using BugHerd for new website feedback, QA, UAT, and client review rounds.

Larger teams with many websites, custom integrations, security requirements, or internal approval processes may take longer, but switching does not usually require a complex migration.

Which is better for website QA?

BugHerd is better for website QA because it captures feedback as tasks and includes technical context such as browser, operating system, screen size, page URL, and screenshots.

That makes it easier for developers and QA teams to understand, reproduce, prioritize, and resolve issues.

Which is better for client website feedback?

BugHerd is better when client feedback needs to be assigned, tracked, and resolved by an internal team.

MarkUp.io is suitable when the main need is simple visual commenting and review.

Which is better for reviewing files?

MarkUp.io is better for broad file review because it supports more types of digital content.

BugHerd supports feedback on websites, Figma designs, PDFs, and images, with a stronger focus on website workflows.

Which is better for web development agencies?

BugHerd is usually better for web development agencies because it supports website feedback, task assignment, client users, unlimited projects, technical metadata, JavaScript installation on all plans, and project boards.

MarkUp.io may suit agencies that mainly need broad visual review across creative files.

Is BugHerd cheaper than MarkUp.io?

Yes, BugHerd is cheaper than MarkUp.io. BugHerd plans start at $42/month (billed annually), while MarkUp.io starts at $79/month.

The better value depends on the workflow. BugHerd is usually the stronger value for teams that need website feedback, unlimited client users, unlimited projects, JavaScript installation on all plans, technical metadata, and built-in task management.

MarkUp.io may be a better fit for teams that mainly need broad visual commenting across many file types.

Can clients leave feedback in BugHerd?

Yes. BugHerd is built for client website feedback. Clients and stakeholders can leave feedback directly on a website, and that feedback becomes a task for the internal team to manage.

Can BugHerd be used for UAT?

Yes. BugHerd is well suited to UAT because reviewers can report issues directly on the website, while the team can manage those issues as tasks through review, resolution, and approval.

Can BugHerd be used after a website goes live?

Yes. BugHerd can be used during website builds, staging reviews, QA, UAT, and after launch. Teams can continue collecting feedback, bug reports, and website improvement requests after a site is live.

Does BugHerd capture technical details?

Yes. BugHerd captures useful technical details with website feedback, including browser, operating system, screen size, page URL, screenshots, and related context.

Does BugHerd integrate with project management tools?

Yes. BugHerd integrates with popular project management, development, communication, CMS, automation, QA, and time-tracking tools.

Can BugHerd replace MarkUp.io for every use case?

BugHerd can replace MarkUp.io for website feedback, client website reviews, QA, UAT, bug tracking, and website project delivery.

BugHerd is a strong replacement when your team wants feedback to become assigned, trackable work rather than remaining only as visual comments.

BugHerd may not replace every MarkUp.io use case for teams that rely heavily on reviewing a wide range of non-website content, such as videos, documents, slides, and other creative assets.

For website feedback workflows, BugHerd is definitely the stronger choice.

Can I use BugHerd for free?

Yes, a free version of BugHerd is available via its free 7-day trial which gives you access to all essential features, allowing you to fully explore how the platform can benefit your team or agency. No credit card is required.

During the trial, you can set up unlimited projects, invite unlimited guests, and experience the full range of BugHerd’s visual website feedback and task management capabilities. This risk-free period enables you to test BugHerd’s fit for your workflow and client needs before committing to a paid plan. 

After the trial, BugHerd’s affordable pricing ensures you get great value, with unlimited projects and guest access included in every plan, making it a cost-effective choice for agencies and teams of any size.

How much does BugHerd cost?

BugHerd offers excellent value without compromising on functionality.  Plans start at just $42/month, which offers unlimited projects and unlimited guests.  

BugHerd offers different pricing plans to accommodate various team sizes and needs. You can find detailed information on the pricing page of the BugHerd website. BugHerd also includes a free trial.

View BugHerd pricing plans

close button